Ubuntu Linux 6.10: 64-Bit vs 32-Bit Benchmark

Ubuntu 6.10 CD CoverAfter installing the latest Linux Ubuntu 6.10 distribution, code named Edgy Eft, both 32-bit and 64-bit versions on the same machine, we found that Ubuntu for AMD64 is faster in Zlib benchmark for over 20 percent. However, 32-bit version of popular Linux distribution was faster in MD5 and Blowfish tests for about 19% and 4% percent, respectively.

The benchmarks were done on a budget configuration, featuring AMD Sempron 2800+ processor, Asus K8U-X motherboard, and 512MB of DDR memory. We have benchmarked with Sempron clocked at default 1.6GHz, as same as with 30% overclocked CPU using JumperFree configuration in motherboard’s BIOS.

The results are in seconds. Lower is better.

Ubuntu 6.10 Zlib Benchmark Results: 64-bit vs 32-bit

Using Zlib and AMD Sempron processor at default 1.6GHz, a 64MB of data was compressed for 4,28 seconds in 64-bit mode, which is for 21,4 percent faster than the same operation in 32-bit environment. After overcocking, the 64-bit Zlib test was done for 3,27 sec, which is faster than 32-bit compression for 23 percent.

Ubuntu 6.10 MD5 Benchmark - 64-bit vs 32-bit

The MD5 sum for 312MB of data in 32-bit Ubuntu was generated for 6,69 and 5,4 seconds at 1.6GHz and 2.08GHz clock speed, respectively. It’s faster than the same operation in 64-bit environment for 18,9 and 19,3 percent.

Ubuntu 6.10 Blowfish Benchmark - 64-bit vs 32-bit

Blowfish benchmark shows 32-bit’s advantage compared to 64-bit for 4.2 percent at both processor clock speeds.

We made these Ubuntu 6.10 Linux 64-bit vs 32-bit benchmarks using the simple Hardinfo application, which can be easily obtained via Synaptic Package Manager. The Hardinfo also provides CPU Fibonacci and SHA1 benchmarks, but on our machine Fibonacci showed 0.00 result on both 64 and 32-bit Ubuntu, while the application crashed during the SHA1 test in 64-bit.


5 Comments | Add your own
  • . james mohlburg | January 28, 2007 at 3:46 am | Permalink

    this ubuntu,gentoo and alinux is not loading to my computer would someone please tell me where i can get some help locally. I am in Baltimore,Md.

  • . John Bowling | March 21, 2007 at 6:26 am | Permalink

    A search of Google for “ASUS M2A-VM Linux Drivers” brought me to this web site.

    ASUS does not have ANY Linux drivers on their North American site.

    AMD does not list ANY drivers for the chip set.

    And you fail to mention it, and the things you are testing do not address my questions.

    So, my question is: Will ALL functions work? Sound, Video (all varieties, including 4 screen displays, output on VGA when not using D(eliberatly) M(angaled) A(access - the lack thereof)
    and most important, SATA installs from most current distros?

  • . Admin | March 22, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    The only problem I had with my configuration is sound under Ubuntu 6.10. ALSA sound system doesn’t recognize motherboard’s sound device. I have downloaded and installed OSS Linux sound system, and it works now.

    Older Ubuntus have problem with Ethernet, but sound works instantly.

    I don’t know if this applies to your motherboard.

  • . bk | April 14, 2007 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    Word of warning about M2A-VM. I just put together a machine with that mobo and the default Gentoo install disk doesn’t recognize any of the SATA drives. I’m desperately hoping a newer kernel will work.

    Right now I’m trying to put together a 3rd party bootable install media but it’s tough because my SATA burner isn’t usable and all I have is a minimal bootable USB stick. :(

Post a Comment
Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*