<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>64-Bit Computers &#187; Windows Vista 64-bit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://64-bit-computers.com/category/windows-vista-64-bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://64-bit-computers.com</link>
	<description>Next Generation Personal Computing News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>iPhone Incompatible with 64-bit Windows Vista, XP</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/iphone-windows-vista-xp-64-bit.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/iphone-windows-vista-xp-64-bit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anina</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/iphone-windows-vista-xp-64-bit.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s iPhone is currently not supported under 64-bit Windows Vista and 64-bit Windows XP operating systems, Engadget reports.  &#8220;The error message, &#8216;The software required for iPhone is not installed. Run the iTunes installer to remove iTunes, then install iTunes again.&#8217; is Apples magical way of telling you that iTunes is not supported on 64-bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/iphone.jpg" onclick="ps_imagemanager_popup(this.href,'iphone','400','365');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"	 ><img src="/wp-content/uploads/.thumbs/.iphone.jpg" alt="iphone" title="iphone" width="100" height="91" border="0" /></a><strong>Apple&#8217;s iPhone</strong> is currently not supported under <strong>64-bit Windows Vista and 64-bit Windows XP</strong> operating systems, Engadget reports.  &#8220;The error message, &#8216;The software required for iPhone is not installed. Run the iTunes installer to remove iTunes, then install iTunes again.&#8217; is Apples magical way of telling you that iTunes is not supported on 64-bit flavors of Microsoft&#8217;s operating systems. Yeah, we agree, they should have listed the incompatibility on the iPhone specs page under Windows System Requirements. Unfortunately for those of you new to Apple software, its buried in support article 301301 which states, &#8216;iTunes is currently not supported in Windows XP Professional x64 Edition or any 64-bit edition of Windows Vista.&#8217; Now you know,&#8221; Engadget says.</p>
<p>We assume Apple will provide iPhone&#8217;s 64-bit Windows compatibility with software updates.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/iphone-not-supported-under-64-bit-windows-xp-or-vista-oops/">Source</a></p>
<p><span id="more-510"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/iphone-windows-vista-xp-64-bit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paint.net v3.08 64-Bit Released</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/paintnet-v308-64-bit.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/paintnet-v308-64-bit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/paintnet-v308-64-bit.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paint.net v3.08, the new version of an open-source image and photo editor that runs on all Windows platforms (32-, 64-bit and Itanium), is released. In 64-bit environments it runs as a full native 64-bit program.
Source
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/paintnet.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_paintnet.png" width="100" height="24" alt="Paint.net" title="Paint.net"  /></a><strong>Paint.net v3.08</strong>, the new version of an open-source image and photo editor that runs on all Windows platforms (32-, 64-bit and Itanium), is released. In 64-bit environments it runs as a full native 64-bit program.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=111&#038;Itemid=1" target="new">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/paintnet-v308-64-bit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VirtualDub - 64-Bit Video Editing Software</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/virtualdub-64-bit-video-editing.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/virtualdub-64-bit-video-editing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/virtualdub-64-bit-video-editing.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64-bit workstations were conquered by the professional video and audio processing software in the first place, among others. Complementing these, VirtualDub x64 has a leading position in the field of non-professional software. Compared to its competitors, its main point of strength is that it was the first to appear as a native 64-bit video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 64-bit workstations were conquered by the professional video and audio processing software in the first place, among others. Complementing these, <strong>VirtualDub x64</strong> has a leading position in the field of non-professional software. Compared to its competitors, its main point of strength is that it was the first to appear as a native 64-bit video capture and processing program in its category.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=71&#038;Itemid=1" target="new">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/virtualdub-64-bit-video-editing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia ForceWare 158.18 for Vista 64-, 32-bit Released</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-15818-for-vista-64-and-32.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-15818-for-vista-64-and-32.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Hardware News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-15818-for-vista-64-and-32.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nvidia has released ForceWare 158.18, the new driver version for its video cards under Windows Vista 64-bit and 32-bit.
ForceWare 158.18 (Updated April 18, 2007) Release Highlights:
•	Added NVIDIA SLI profile for Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2
•	Adds support for GeForce 8600 GTS, GeForce 8600 GT, and GeForce 8500 GT, GeForce 8400 GS, and GeForce 8300 GS GPUs.
•	Increased [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/nvidia_forceware.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_nvidia_forceware.jpg" width="160" height="24" alt="nVidia ForceWare" title="nVidia ForceWare"  /></a><strong>Nvidia</strong> has released <strong>ForceWare 158.18</strong>, the new driver version for its video cards under Windows Vista 64-bit and 32-bit.</p>
<p><span id="more-428"></span>ForceWare 158.18 (Updated April 18, 2007) Release Highlights:</p>
<p>•	Added NVIDIA SLI profile for Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2<br />
•	Adds support for GeForce 8600 GTS, GeForce 8600 GT, and GeForce 8500 GT, GeForce 8400 GS, and GeForce 8300 GS GPUs.<br />
•	Increased performance in 3D applications.<br />
•	PureVideo HD support.<br />
•	Add support for forcing Vertical Sync in DirectX applications.<br />
•	Updated NVIDIA Control Panel with improved user interface.<br />
•	Numerous game and application compatibility fixes.<br />
•	This driver supports the following 3D features:<br />
Single GPU support:<br />
- DirectX 9 support for GeForce 6/7/8 series GPUs<br />
- DirectX 10 support for GeForce 8 series GPUs<br />
- OpenGL support for GeForce 6/7/8 series GPUs<br />
NVIDIA SLI support:<br />
- DirectX 9 support for 6/7/8 series GPUs<br />
- OpenGL support for 6/7/8 series GPUs<br />
•	DirectX 10 NVIDIA SLI support for GeForce 8800 GPUs will be available in a future driver</p>
<p>NVIDIA ForceWare 158.18 for Windows Vista 64-bit can be downloaded from <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x64_158.18.html" target="new">Company’s web-site</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-15818-for-vista-64-and-32.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Catalyst 7.3 for Vista 64-bit and XP x64 Released</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/ati-catalyst-73-vista-64-bit-windows-xp-x64.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/ati-catalyst-73-vista-64-bit-windows-xp-x64.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Hardware News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/ati-catalyst-73-vista-64-bit-windows-xp-x64.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD ATI has released Catalyst Software Suite Version 7.3, featuring the updated drivers for ATI Radeon, ATI All-in-Wonder, Theater 550 PRO and TV Wonder Elite video cards.
ATI Catalyst 7.3 introduces OpenGL CrossFire support for the entire ATI Radeon X1000 product series under 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista. Users will see significant performance gains [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/ATI_Catalyst.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_ATI_Catalyst.jpg" width="140" height="119" alt="ATI Catalyst" title="ATI Catalyst"  /></a><strong>AMD ATI</strong> has released <strong>Catalyst Software Suite Version 7.3</strong>, featuring the updated drivers for ATI Radeon, ATI All-in-Wonder, Theater 550 PRO and TV Wonder Elite video cards.</p>
<p>ATI Catalyst 7.3 introduces OpenGL CrossFire support for the entire ATI Radeon X1000 product series under 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista. Users will see significant performance gains in a number of applications when running in CrossFire mode under Windows Vista, according to Release Notes.</p>
<p><span id="more-399"></span>&#8220;Catalyst 7.3 includes CrossFire enhancements for Windows Vista that enable the Alternate Frame Rendering (AFR) CrossFire rendering mode by default, enabling performance benefits for all AFR compatible applications immediately (including newly released applications that have not been officially profiled for CrossFire). Future Catalyst releases will add further CrossFire performance gains once new applications have been profiled specifically for CrossFire&#8221;, AMD ATI says.</p>
<p>It is claimed that Dark Messiah Might and Magic performance improves 12.5% or greater on all Radeon X1000 series configurations when running in CrossFire mode under both the Windows XP and Windows Vista operating systems. Larger gains of 60% or more can be seen on high end products.</p>
<p>The resolved issues for the Windows Vista Operating System include fixes for 3DMark2006, as well as for Call of Duty, Call of Duty - United Offensive, City of Heroes, Doom 3, NBA Live 07, Never Winter Nights and Never Winter Nights - Shadows of Undrentide.</p>
<p>The Catalyst 7.3 for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows XP is also released.</p>
<p><a href="http://ati.amd.com/support/drivers/vista64/common-vista64.html" target="new">Download Catalyst 7.3 Display Driver for Windows Vista (64 bit)</a><br />
<a href="http://ati.amd.com/support/drivers/xp64/radeonx-xp64.html" target="new">Download Catalyst 7.3 for Windows XP Professional x64 Edition</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/ati-catalyst-73-vista-64-bit-windows-xp-x64.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Array Systems: Users Better Served with 32- Than 64-Bit Vista</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/array-systems-32-bit-vs-64-bit-windows-vista.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/array-systems-32-bit-vs-64-bit-windows-vista.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/array-systems-32-bit-vs-64-bit-windows-vista.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Array Systems Inc, which assists its small – medium sized business clients with the integration of the Windows Vista OS, claims that mainstream users are better served with the 32-bit Vista than with its 64-bit counterpart.
&#8220;Mainstream users are best served with the 32-bit applications of Windows Vista and will experience the greatest compatibility with peripherals, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/array_systems.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_array_systems.jpg" width="140" height="70" alt="Array Systems" title="Array Systems"  /></a><strong>Array Systems Inc</strong>, which assists its small – medium sized business clients with the integration of the Windows Vista OS, claims that mainstream users are better served with the 32-bit Vista than with its 64-bit counterpart.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mainstream users are best served with the 32-bit applications of Windows Vista and will experience the greatest compatibility with peripherals, applications, and improved features. The use of 64-bit implementations of Vista should be based on need. If you have a special application or operational requirement today that mandates this extended version of Vista, proceed ahead; just be sure to research and resolve potential conflicts and remedies first. Windows Vista 64 will gather increased momentum and acceptance; however the practical return on investment may be years away. As with any new product offering, the key will be testing the Vista environment with current application prior to making an upgrade decision,&#8221; Array System&#8217;s says in analysis on Microsoft&#8217;s 32-bit and 64-bit Vista.</p>
<p><span id="more-394"></span><a href="http://www.arraysystems.com/press_release_3_24_2007.html" target="new">Array Systems</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/array-systems-32-bit-vs-64-bit-windows-vista.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Codec Package x64 Components 1.1.2 Released</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-codec-package-x64-components-112.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-codec-package-x64-components-112.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-codec-package-x64-components-112.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Windows Vista Codec Package x64 Components 1.1.2, which enables xvid, divx and DVD playback in 64-bit Vista&#8217;s Media Center, was released this week.
&#8220;Did you buy Vista x64 but find that almost nothing will play in MediaCenter? Do you want to watch your favorite video&#8217;s in MediaCenter? These package is tested on Vista Ultimate x64. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/vistacodecs%20x64.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_vistacodecs%20x64.jpg" width="140" height="108" alt="Vista Codec Package x64 Components 1.1.2" title="Vista Codec Package x64 Components 1.1.2"  /></a>The <strong>Windows Vista Codec Package x64 Components 1.1.2</strong>, which enables xvid, divx and DVD playback in 64-bit Vista&#8217;s Media Center, was released this week.</p>
<p>&#8220;Did you buy Vista x64 but find that almost nothing will play in MediaCenter? Do you want to watch your favorite video&#8217;s in MediaCenter? These package is tested on Vista Ultimate x64. It is a fully functional standalone installation,&#8221; the publisher&#8217;s description says.</p>
<p><span id="more-390"></span><a href="http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Vista_Codec_Package_x64_Components/1159994557/2" target="new">More Info and Download</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-codec-package-x64-components-112.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Published Windows Vista Certified Sofware List</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-certified-32-bit-64-bit-sofware-list.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-certified-32-bit-64-bit-sofware-list.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-certified-32-bit-64-bit-sofware-list.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has published a list of applications that have earned the &#8220;Certified for Windows Vista&#8221; logo or the &#8220;Works with Windows Vista&#8221; logo. The list applies to both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista versions.
Microsoft explains that the &#8220;Certified for Windows Vista&#8221; logo is a compatibility designation for applications and devices that have passed a rigorous testing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/windows-vista-certified.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_windows-vista-certified.jpg" width="98" height="140" alt="Certified for Windows Vista" title="Certified for Windows Vista"  /></a><strong>Microsoft</strong> has published a list of applications that have earned the &#8220;<strong>Certified for Windows Vista</strong>&#8221; logo or the &#8220;<strong>Works with Windows Vista</strong>&#8221; logo. The list applies to both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista versions.</p>
<p>Microsoft explains that the &#8220;Certified for Windows Vista&#8221; logo is a compatibility designation for applications and devices that have passed a rigorous testing program on computers that are running Windows Vista. The technical requirements for this designation target four core areas: reliability, security, compatibility with Windows Vista and future operating systems, and installation and removal.</p>
<p><span id="more-348"></span>The &#8220;Works with Windows Vista&#8221; logo is a compatibility designation that is designed to encourage Windows Vista compatibility for the current generation of Windows-based applications. To receive this designation, software companies test their applications to make sure that the applications meet the program&#8217;s guidelines.</p>
<p>However, there are many applications that are compatible and work well with Windows Vista but that are not listed in this compatibility list, because such applications have not yet gone through the Windows Vista logo program or are still going though this program. The new applications are continually being added to the program, Microsoft says.</p>
<p>You can see the Microsoft’s list <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933305http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933305" target="new">here</a>.</p>
<p>Also, at Iexbeta.com there is a <a href="http://www.iexbeta.com/wiki/index.php/Windows_Vista_RTM_Software_Compatibility_List" target="new">Windows Vista RTM Software Compatibility List</a>, maintained by users’ community, with  32-bit and 64-bit applications listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-certified-32-bit-64-bit-sofware-list.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA ForceWare 100.65 Drivers Support DirectX 10, Vista 64-bit</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-10065-drivers-directx-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-10065-drivers-directx-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Hardware News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-10065-drivers-directx-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NVIDIA has released the world’s first WHQL-certified drivers with support for Microsoft&#8217;s DirectX 10, the latest suite of multimedia application programming interfaces (APIs). The announced NVIDIA&#8217;s ForceWare 100.65 drivers support GeForce 6- and 7-series graphics cards, as same as 8-series designed for DirectX 10 gaming and multimedia. 
Release Highlights of the ForceWare 100.65 include: 
- [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/crysis.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_crysis.jpg" width="140" height="78" alt="Crysis, the DirectX 10 Game" title="Crysis - the DirectX 10 Game Screenshot"  /></a><strong>NVIDIA</strong> has released the world’s first WHQL-certified drivers with support for Microsoft&#8217;s DirectX 10, the latest suite of multimedia application programming interfaces (APIs). The announced NVIDIA&#8217;s <strong>ForceWare 100.65</strong> drivers support GeForce 6- and 7-series graphics cards, as same as 8-series designed for DirectX 10 gaming and multimedia. </p>
<p><span id="more-346"></span>Release Highlights of the ForceWare 100.65 include: </p>
<p>- WHQL Certified driver for GeForce 8800, GeForce 7 series and GeForce 6 series GPUs<br />
- Beta driver for NVIDIA SLI support for GeForce 8800 GTX/GTS GPUs </p>
<p>ForceWare 100.65 driver incorporates the following features:</p>
<p>- Single GPU support<br />
- DirectX 9 support for GeForce 6/7/8 series GPUs<br />
- DirectX 10 support for GeForce 8800 GPUs<br />
- OpenGL support for GeForce 6/7/8 series GPUs<br />
- NVIDIA SLI support<br />
- DirectX 9 support for GeForce 8800 GPUs<br />
- OpenGL support for GeForce 8800 GPUs<br />
- DirectX 9 and OpenGL NVIDIA SLI support for GeForce 6 and 7 series GPUs and DirectX 10 NVIDIA SLI support for GeForce 8800 GPUs will be available in a future driver</p>
<p>Microsft says DirectX 10 features enhanced 3-D graphics-rendering capabilities and helps noticeably improve your computer&#8217;s in-game and multimedia performance.</p>
<p>According to the reports, many of the PC games scheduled for release in 2007 have been designed to exploit the new features of DirectX 10. It is not known if these games will be released for 64-bit operating systems.</p>
<p>The ForceWare 100.65 for Windows Vista 64-bit can be downloaded at <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x64_100.65.html" target="new">NVIDIA&#8217;s official web site</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/nvidia-forceware-10065-drivers-directx-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 1.0 - Free, Vista 64-Bit Ready</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-virtual-pc-2007-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-virtual-pc-2007-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-virtual-pc-2007-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has released Virtual PC 2007 1.0 virtualization software, which enables the use of multiple operating systems at the same time on the same physical computer. Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the new Virtual PC 2007 are available free of charge.
Along with support for Windows Vista 64-bit as a host, VPC 2007 compared to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/virtual_pc.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_virtual_pc.jpg" width="117" height="140" alt="Virtual PC 2007 1.0" title="Virtual PC 2007 1.0"  /></a><strong>Microsoft</strong> has released <strong>Virtual PC 2007 1.0</strong> virtualization software, which enables the use of multiple operating systems at the same time on the same physical computer. Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the new Virtual PC 2007 are available free of charge.</p>
<p>Along with support for Windows Vista 64-bit as a host, VPC 2007 compared to previous VPC 2004 also includes support for 32-bit Vista as a host and as a guest OS. The performance is also improved compared to Virtual PC 2004, Microsoft says.</p>
<p><span id="more-345"></span>The Virtual PC 2007 1.0 can be downloaded for free from the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=04D26402-3199-48A3-AFA2-2DC0B40A73B6&#038;displaylang=en" target="new">Microsoft&#8217;s official web site</a>.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="windows vista ultimate"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-virtual-pc-2007-10-windows-vista-64-bit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CyberLink Released 64-bit Software Encoder for Vista</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/cyberlink-native-software-encoder-11-64-bit-windows-vista.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/cyberlink-native-software-encoder-11-64-bit-windows-vista.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/cyberlink-native-software-encoder-11-64-bit-windows-vista.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CyberLink Corporation, a digital home solutions provider, today released CyberLink Software Encoder 1.1, for enabling real-time MPEG-2 TV recording via Windows Vista Media Center, including 64-bit version.
CyberLink Software Encoder 1.1 offers native 64-bit support for PCs using the Windows Vista operating system. The benefits include better multi-tasking with less loading on system resources, as same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/wp-content/cyberlink_logo.jpg" width="136" height="64" alt="CyberLink" title="CyberLink" />CyberLink Corporation, a digital home solutions provider, today released <strong>CyberLink Software Encoder 1.1</strong>, for enabling real-time MPEG-2 TV recording via Windows Vista Media Center, including 64-bit version.</p>
<p>CyberLink Software Encoder 1.1 offers native 64-bit support for PCs using the Windows Vista operating system. The benefits include better multi-tasking with less loading on system resources, as same as creation of larger, higher-quality, video files achieved by using more memory made available on 64-bit systems, according to CyberLink.</p>
<p><span id="more-338"></span>The 64-bit Encoder 1.1 also provides more accurate recording of TV content, ensuring fewer jitters and frame drops, creating files that deliver a smoother viewing experience, the Corporation says.</p>
<p>The new encoding software is optimized for dual-core processors from Intel and AMD.</p>
<p>&#8220;With real-time encoder CyberLink Software Encoder, users can record TV programs while performing other tasks,&#8221; said Alice H. Chang, CEO of CyberLink. &#8220;Optimization for Windows Vista and the latest processors ensures processing-intensive TV recording is performed with minimal burden on a computer’s CPU, delivering smooth DVD-quality video, while ensuring enough processing power for other common tasks.&#8221;</p>
<p>The CyberLink Software Encoder meets the requirements for the Windows Logo Program (WLP) for Windows Vista.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="CyberLink Software Encoder 1.1 for Windows Vista"/></div>
<p><a href="http://www.cyberlink.com/eng/press_room/view_1321.html" target="new">CyberLink</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/cyberlink-native-software-encoder-11-64-bit-windows-vista.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CryptoExpert 2007 PRO Works on Vista 64-bit</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/cryptoexpert-2007-pro-windows-vista-64-bit.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/cryptoexpert-2007-pro-windows-vista-64-bit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/cryptoexpert-2007-pro-windows-vista-64-bit.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SecureAction released CryptoExpert 2007 PRO encryption software, which works on Windows Vista 64-bit and Windows XP-64 bit. 
CryptoExpert creates encrypted virtual disks and these disks are visible as usual disks with drive letters. It uses four powerful encryption algorithms to encrypt your data: AES, BLOWFISH, CAST and 3DES, which are world&#8217;s standards of encryption. CryptoExpert [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/CRYPTOEXPERT.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_CRYPTOEXPERT.png" width="140" height="78" alt="CRYPTOEXPERT 2007 Pro" title="CRYPTOEXPERT 2007 Pro"  /></a><strong>SecureAction</strong> released <strong>CryptoExpert 2007 PRO</strong> encryption software, which works on Windows Vista 64-bit and Windows XP-64 bit. </p>
<p>CryptoExpert creates encrypted virtual disks and these disks are visible as usual disks with drive letters. It uses four powerful encryption algorithms to encrypt your data: AES, BLOWFISH, CAST and 3DES, which are world&#8217;s standards of encryption. CryptoExpert 2007 PRO  supports 256 Gb and larger encrypted drive.</p>
<p><span id="more-330"></span>Both 32-bit and 64-bit CryptoExpert 2007 PRO Trial free download, as same as full versions priced at $59.95, are available at <a href="http://www.secureaction.com/cryptoexpert/pro/" target="new">SecureAction’s website</a>.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="CryptoExpert 2007 PRO encryption software"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/cryptoexpert-2007-pro-windows-vista-64-bit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kaspersky Internet Security and Anti-Virus Support 64-bit Vista</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/kaspersky-internet-security-and-anti-virus-60-64-bit-windows-vista.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/kaspersky-internet-security-and-anti-virus-60-64-bit-windows-vista.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kaspersky Lab announced the release of Maintenance Pack 2 for Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0 and Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0. An essential new feature introduced in Maintenance Pack 2 is support for Windows Vista, including the 64-bit version of Microsoft&#8217;s new operating system.
&#8220;Earlier antivirus product versions are not compatible with Vista because of the operating system&#8217;s new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/kis_6_0.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_kis_6_0.jpg" width="140" height="140" alt="Kaspersky KIS and KAV 6.0 (Vista Compatibile)" title="Kaspersky KIS and KAV 6.0 (Vista Compatibile)"  /></a>Kaspersky Lab announced the release of <strong>Maintenance Pack 2</strong> for <strong>Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0</strong> and <strong>Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0</strong>. An essential new feature introduced in Maintenance Pack 2 is support for Windows Vista, including the 64-bit version of Microsoft&#8217;s new operating system.</p>
<p>&#8220;Earlier antivirus product versions are not compatible with Vista because of the operating system&#8217;s new architecture. With Maintenance Pack 2, Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0 and Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0 will be fully compatible with both the 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista. At the same time, Maintenance Pack 2 includes all the features and additions that were included in the first Maintenance pack, including full-scale support for Windows XP 64-bit Edition, extended on-demand scanning functionality, a number of improvements to the proactive defense module and protection of Windows Task Manager against injection of malicious dynamic-link libraries (dll),&#8221; the company&#8217;s press release says.</p>
<p><span id="more-324"></span>Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0 protects the computer against penetration of malicious programs, while Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0 is an integrated solution that protects the PC against all types of IT threats, including malicious programs, spyware, hacker attacks, network fraud and spam. It is explained that the antivirus component of Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0 includes all the capabilities of Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0"/></div>
<p><a href="http://www.kaspersky.com/productupdates" target="new">Kaspersky Product Updates</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/kaspersky-internet-security-and-anti-virus-60-64-bit-windows-vista.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista 64-bit Comes with Ultimate Edition Only</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-64-bit-purchase.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-64-bit-purchase.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64-bit version of Windows Vista can be obtained in retail only if you purchase the Ultimate Edition of Microsoft&#8217;s new operating system.
According to the CompUSA&#8217;s product pages, Windows Vista Basic, Home Premium and Business ship with 32-bit DVD only, while the Ultimate comes with both 32-bit and 64-bit versions.

CompUSA.com: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/windows_vista_ultimate.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_windows_vista_ultimate.jpg" width="109" height="140" alt="Windows Vista Ultimate 32- and 64-Bit" title="Windows Vista Ultimate 32- and 64-Bit"  /></a>The <strong>64-bit</strong> version of <strong>Windows Vista</strong> can be obtained in retail only if you purchase the Ultimate Edition of Microsoft&#8217;s new operating system.</p>
<p>According to the CompUSA&#8217;s product pages, Windows Vista Basic, Home Premium and Business ship with 32-bit DVD only, while the Ultimate comes with both 32-bit and 64-bit versions.</p>
<p><span id="more-317"></span><br />
<blockquote><a href="http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?product_code=342843&#038;pfp=jan28" target="new">CompUSA.com: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium - 66L-00002 - Software » Operating Systems » Windows</a><br />
Windows Vista Basic, Home Premium and Business all ship with 32-bit DVD and information on obtaining 32-bit CDs or a 64-bit DVD, additional fees may apply.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?product_code=342849&#038;pfp=jan28" target="new">CompUSA.com: Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate - 66R-00002 - Software » Operating Systems » Windows</a><br />
Windows Vista Ultimate ships with 32-bit and 64-bit DVD and information on obtaining 32-bit CDs, additional fees may apply.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Vista Ultimate is priced at $399 at CompUSA, but it can be found at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fsoftware-business-education-finance-childrens%2Fb%3F%255Fencoding%3DUTF8%26node%3D229534&#038;tag=serbianbusine-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325" target="new">Amazon</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=serbianbusine-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> for $378.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="windows vista ultimate"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-64-bit-purchase.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Early for 64-bit Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-early.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-early.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chip makers AMD and Intel think the 64-bit version of Microsoft Windows Vista operating system will not take over the enthusiast market in 2007, The Inquirer reports. 
“Without an exception, they all think it&#8217;s too early and the drivers won’t be that polished for 64 bit either. AMD and Intel have CPUs which can support [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/Win_Vista.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_Win_Vista.jpg" width="160" height="32" alt="Windows Vista" title="Windows Vista"  /></a>Chip makers AMD and Intel think the <strong>64-bit version of Microsoft Windows Vista</strong> operating system will not take over the enthusiast market in 2007, The Inquirer reports. </p>
<p>“Without an exception, they all think it&#8217;s too early and the drivers won’t be that polished for 64 bit either. AMD and Intel have CPUs which can support 64 operating systems but the drivers are still lame, unpolished and slow compared with 32 bit,” the report says. </p>
<p><span id="more-302"></span>Intel also said that Vista 32 is fine as it will address 2.75 or 3.25GB from the 4GB of memory, if provided.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="Microsoft Vista Ultimate"/></div>
<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36938" target="new">The Inquirer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-early.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Adobe Photoshop CS3 64-Bit</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/adobe-photoshop-cs3-64-bit-not-yet.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/adobe-photoshop-cs3-64-bit-not-yet.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Leopard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/adobe-photoshop-cs3-64-bit-not-yet.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upcoming CS3 version of Adobe Photoshop will not include 64-bit version of this popular image-editing software. According to Photoshop co-architect Scott Byer, &#8220;at some point it will make sense to do a 64-bit version&#8221;.
&#8220;It&#8217;s definitely a ‘when’ question, not an ‘if’, and there are a lot of factors involved,&#8221; Byer said in his blog.
But, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/adobe_photoshop_cs3.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_adobe_photoshop_cs3.jpg" width="123" height="140" alt="Adobe Photoshop CS3" title="Adobe Photoshop CS3"  /></a>The upcoming CS3 version of <strong>Adobe Photoshop</strong> will not include <strong>64-bit</strong> version of this popular image-editing software. According to Photoshop co-architect Scott Byer, &#8220;at some point it will make sense to do a 64-bit version&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s definitely a ‘when’ question, not an ‘if’, and there are a lot of factors involved,&#8221; Byer said in his blog.</p>
<p><span id="more-261"></span>But, he reminded that a 64-bit version of Photoshop would have to be a completely separate binary from the 32-bit version, causing an extra cost.  </p>
<p>“A separate binary has a huge cost associated with it (in terms of features we can&#8217;t do because we have to spend resources elsewhere).  Quality assurance is a big part of that - you essentially have to dive in and test every corner of the app for each binary, across the matrix of supported operating systems - but there are also many ancillary pieces that add to that cost as well.  And given that a Universal Binary application really is two separate binaries smashed together (and accounting for the kinds of issues that an application can have going from big endian (PPC) to little endian) we already had a lot of extra cost going through this cycle.  Adding the cost of adding a 64-bit version to the mix of things that were already on the have-to-do list - especially in light of the very limited benefits - and doing a 64-bit version this cycle really became an unreasonable thing to think about it,&#8221; Byer explained. </p>
<p>He assumes that number of Photoshop customers running the 64-bit Windows Vista will be very small over the next couple of years. Also, since Macintosh OS X 10.4 isn&#8217;t fully 64-bit - many of the libraries an application would need to be fully 64-bit aren&#8217;t available, so Mac users currently could not run a 64-bit version of Photoshop, even if it is available.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="Adobe Photoshop CS3"/></div>
<p><a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/scottbyer/" target="new">Scott Byer&#8217;s Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/adobe-photoshop-cs3-64-bit-not-yet.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Benchmark: 64-Bit Faster Than 32-Bit</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmark.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmark.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmark.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64-bit version of Windows Vista operating system is for about 10.9 percent faster than 32-bit Vista, according to the GeekBench benchmark for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows platforms.
Both 32-bit and 64-bit tests were done on a budget AMD Sempron 2800+ powered desktop PC, featuring Asus K8U-X motherboard with 512MB of main memory.
The 32-bit Windows Vista [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/windows_vista_32_vs_64_bit.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_windows_vista_32_vs_64_bit.png" width="140" height="78" alt="Windows Vista 32-Bit vs 64-Bit Benchmark" title="Windows Vista 32-Bit vs 64-Bit Benchmark"  /></a>The <strong>64-bit</strong> version of <strong>Windows Vista</strong> operating system is for about 10.9 percent faster than <strong>32-bit</strong> Vista, according to the GeekBench benchmark for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows platforms.</p>
<p>Both 32-bit and 64-bit tests were done on a budget AMD Sempron 2800+ powered desktop PC, featuring Asus K8U-X motherboard with 512MB of main memory.</p>
<p><span id="more-218"></span>The 32-bit Windows Vista Ultimate achived 99.8  GeekBench points, while the 64-bit version of the same OS gained 110.7 points. The higher number of points is better. This Windows Vista 32-bit vs 64-bit benchmark consist of measuring integer performance, floating point performance, as same as memory and stream performance.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="microsoft vista ultimate"/></div>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse" bordercolor="#666666" width="100%" id="AutoNumber1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Windows Vista Ultimate</strong>
</td>
<td><strong>32-Bit</strong></td>
<td><strong>64-Bit</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Integer<br />
Performance</strong></td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Emulate 6502</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>45.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>46.7</td>
<td>62.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Blowfish</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>106.5</td>
<td>118.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>106.5</td>
<td>119.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
bzip2 Compress</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>160.1</td>
<td>172.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>157.6</td>
<td>95.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
bzip2 Decompress</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>129.1</td>
<td>139.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>133.6</td>
<td>143.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Floating<br />
Point Performance</strong></td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Mandelbrot</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>108</td>
<td>77.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>108.1</td>
<td>98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Dot Product</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>50.9</td>
<td>150.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>50.6</td>
<td>150.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded vector</td>
<td>124.4</td>
<td>196.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded vector</td>
<td>122.2</td>
<td>196.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
JPEG Compress</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>104.8</td>
<td>103.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>105</td>
<td>103.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
JPEG Decompress</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>97.8</td>
<td>115.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>97.9</td>
<td>114.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Memory<br />
Performance</strong></td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Read Sequential</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>139.2</td>
<td>137.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>143.3</td>
<td>142.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Write Sequential</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>110</td>
<td>109.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>116</td>
<td>115.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stdlib Allocate</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>129.2</td>
<td>92.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>126.9</td>
<td>92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stdlib Write</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>40.9</td>
<td>88.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>42.1</td>
<td>96.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stdlib Copy</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>59.7</td>
<td>100.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>66.4</td>
<td>105.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Stream<br />
Performance</strong></td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stream Copy</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>103.9</td>
<td>106.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>104.5</td>
<td>106.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded vector</td>
<td>97.3</td>
<td>96.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded vector</td>
<td>95.7</td>
<td>95.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stream Scale</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>118</td>
<td>118.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>115.3</td>
<td>116.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded vector</td>
<td>97.2</td>
<td>98.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded vector</td>
<td>95.6</td>
<td>97.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stream Add</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>95.1</td>
<td>97.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>91.5</td>
<td>93.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded vector</td>
<td>107.4</td>
<td>108</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded vector</td>
<td>103.4</td>
<td>103.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;<br />
Stream Triad</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded scalar</td>
<td>84.1</td>
<td>90.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded scalar</td>
<td>81.3</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
single-threaded vector</td>
<td>86.4</td>
<td>87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
multi-threaded vector</td>
<td>83.1</td>
<td>83.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;
</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OVERALL:</td>
<td>99.8</td>
<td>110.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="microsoft vista ultimate"/></div>
<p><a href="http://www.geekpatrol.ca/geekbench/" target="new">GeekBench</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmark.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Consumer Launch Webcast</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-business-launch.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-business-launch.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/199.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can join Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates for a live webcast celebrating the worldwide launch of Windows Vista and the 2007 Microsoft Office System.
You can watch the webcast here:
http://www.microsoft.com/events/executives/billgates.mspx
Old page version: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer today announces business availability of Windows Vista, the 2007 Office system, and Exchange Server 2007 at a press conference in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can join Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates for a live webcast celebrating the worldwide launch of Windows Vista and the 2007 Microsoft Office System.</p>
<p>You can watch the webcast here:<br />
http://www.microsoft.com/events/executives/billgates.mspx</p>
<p><em>Old page version:</em> Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer today announces business availability of Windows Vista, the 2007 Office system, and Exchange Server 2007 at a press conference in New York City. The webcast begins at 7:35 a.m. PST / 10:35 a.m. EST.</p>
<p>You can watch it in your Media Player by clicking here:</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="bullet" valign="top">•</td>
<td class="linkItem"><a href="http://metahost.origindigital.com/microsoft/20061130/bv_launch_20061130_100.asx">100K</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="bullet" valign="top">•</td>
<td class="linkItem"><a href="http://metahost.origindigital.com/microsoft/20061130/bv_launch_20061130_220.asx">220K</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="bullet" valign="top">•</td>
<td class="linkItem"><a href="http://metahost.origindigital.com/microsoft/20061130/bv_launch_20061130_500.asx">500K</a> </p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="microsoft vista ultimate"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-business-launch.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://metahost.origindigital.com/microsoft/20061130/bv_launch_20061130_100.asx" length="656" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
<enclosure url="http://metahost.origindigital.com/microsoft/20061130/bv_launch_20061130_220.asx" length="656" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
<enclosure url="http://metahost.origindigital.com/microsoft/20061130/bv_launch_20061130_500.asx" length="656" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still No 64-Bit Flash Player Available</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/no-64-bit-flash-player-available.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/no-64-bit-flash-player-available.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux 64-bit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Leopard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Vista versions are released to manufacturing, there is still no 64-bit Flash Player, making it impossible to view Flash content in 64-bit web browsers. Adobe says its developers are working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of company&#8217;s &#8220;ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/wp-content/_flash.png" width="132" height="140" alt="Flash" title="Flash" />Although both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Vista versions are released to manufacturing, there is still no <strong>64-bit Flash Player</strong>, making it impossible to view Flash content in 64-bit web browsers. Adobe says its developers are working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of company&#8217;s &#8220;ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player&#8221;. But, Adobe hasn&#8217;t yet announced timing or release dates.</p>
<p>The company says users currently must use 32-bit Flash Player in 32-bit browser to view Flash content on a 64-bit operating system. In 64-bit Windows Vista both 64-bit and emulated 32-bit Internet Explorer are installed by default. Linux users must install 32-bit browser and 32-bit Flash Player plug-in on their 64-bit operating systems.</p>
<p>Since 64-bit Linux users downgrade their browsers for years in order to use Flash, and since Microsoft&#8217;s 64-bit Vista (retail) and Apple&#8217;s 64-bit Mac OS X Leopard operating systems are scheduled to ship in January and spring 2007 respectively, we hope that 64-bit Flash will be released by then. </p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="64-bit OS"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/no-64-bit-flash-player-available.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Pre-Order at Amazon.com Disabled</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-pre-order-amazon-disabled.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-pre-order-amazon-disabled.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-pre-order-amazon-disabled.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Vista, the new Microsoft&#8217;s operating system, is no longer available for pre-order via Amazon.com. 
&#8220;Because of a Microsoft request, the many versions of the Windows Vista operating system are not currently available for pre-order at Amazon.com. They are estimated to be available January 30, 2007, and you can sign up at right to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/vista_logo2.gif" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_vista_logo2.gif" width="140" height="140" alt="Windows Vista" title="Windows Vista"  /></a><strong>Windows Vista</strong>, the new Microsoft&#8217;s operating system, is no longer available for pre-order via Amazon.com. </p>
<p>&#8220;Because of a Microsoft request, the many versions of the Windows Vista operating system are not currently available for pre-order at Amazon.com. They are estimated to be available January 30, 2007, and you can sign up at right to be notified via e-mail when Vista becomes available for pre-order. If you&#8217;ve already pre-ordered Vista at Amazon.com, your order will be fulfilled when the software is available&#8221;, the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-Vista/lm/R3356APT87B4DV/104-1075949-0923132" target="new">Windows Vista product pages at Amazon.com</a> say. </p>
<p><span id="more-170"></span><a href="http://64-bit-computers.com/january-30-2007-windows-vista-release-date.html" target="new">Since August</a>, when the pre-order offer started, there was no information about which listed Vista DVD is 32-bit and which is 64-bit version. There were only different Vista editions, such as Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate, as same as offered corresponding upgrades from XP.</p>
<p>It was reported <a href="http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-harder-push.html" target="new">earlier this week</a> that Windows Vista will ship on a single DVD, in either a 32- or 64-bit configuration, while users of Windows Vista Ultimate will get both versions.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="Microsoft Vista Ultimate"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-pre-order-amazon-disabled.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Starts a Harder Push on the 64-Bit Vista</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-harder-push.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-harder-push.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-harder-push.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Windows Vista release to computer makers this week, Microsoft starts a harder push on the 64-bit version of the company&#8217;s new operating system, said Barry Goffe, director in the Windows client product management team. He said that in order to use the Windows Vista logo, device manufacturers must provide their drivers in both (32-bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/Win_Vista.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_Win_Vista.jpg" width="160" height="32" alt="Windows Vista" title="Windows Vista"  /></a>With <strong>Windows Vista</strong> release to computer makers this week, Microsoft starts a harder push on the 64-bit version of the company&#8217;s new operating system, said Barry Goffe, director in the Windows client product management team. He said that in order to use the Windows Vista logo, device manufacturers must provide their drivers in both (32-bit and 64-bit) versions. “We’re really making sure that 32-bit and 64-bit are equally good choice[s] for a customer,” Goffe said.</p>
<p><span id="more-147"></span><a href="http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/1_1/daily_news/29670-1.html" target="new">Washington Technology</a> reported that Vista will ship on a single DVD, in either a 32- or 64-bit configuration, while users of Windows Vista Ultimate will get both versions.</p>
<p>It was reported earlier that <a href="http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-moving-to-64-bit-only-says-gates.html" target="new">Microsoft will be shifting its products to 64-bit only</a>.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="Microsoft Vista Ultimate"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/64-bit-windows-vista-harder-push.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 30, 2007 - Windows Vista Release Date</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/january-30-2007-windows-vista-release-date.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/january-30-2007-windows-vista-release-date.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/january-30-2007-windows-vista-release-date.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The forthcoming Microsoft Windows Vista is now available for pre-order at Amazon.com. The Vista will be released on January 30, 2007, according to Amazon.
Here is a simplified list of listed Windows Vista versions.


Windows Vista Version
Full
Upgrade


Windows Vista Home Basic
$199
$99


Windows Vista Home Premium
$239
$159


Windows Vista Business
$299
$199


Windows Vista Ultimate
$399
$259


See full list here: Windows Vista Pre-Order
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/Windows%20Vista.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/_Windows%20Vista.jpg" width="100" height="69" alt="Windows Vista" title="Windows Vista"  /></a>The forthcoming Microsoft <strong>Windows Vista</strong> is now available for pre-order at Amazon.com. The Vista will be <strong>released on January 30, 2007</strong>, according to Amazon.</p>
<p>Here is a simplified list of listed Windows Vista versions.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse" bordercolor="#666666" width="100%" id="AutoNumber1">
<tr>
<td width="33%">Windows Vista Version</td>
<td width="33%">Full</td>
<td width="34%">Upgrade</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%">Windows Vista Home Basic</td>
<td width="33%">$199</td>
<td width="34%">$99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%">Windows Vista Home Premium</td>
<td width="33%">$239</td>
<td width="34%">$159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%">Windows Vista Business</td>
<td width="33%">$299</td>
<td width="34%">$199</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%">Windows Vista Ultimate</td>
<td width="33%">$399</td>
<td width="34%">$259</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>See full list here: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?link_code=ur2&#038;tag=serbianbusine-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;location=/gp/search%3F%26index=software%26keywords=windows%20vista%26_encoding=UTF8">Windows Vista Pre-Order</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/january-30-2007-windows-vista-release-date.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD DVD and Blu-ray Support in 32-Bit Vista Questioned</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/hd-dvd-and-blu-ray-support-in-32-bit-vista-questioned.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/hd-dvd-and-blu-ray-support-in-32-bit-vista-questioned.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/hd-dvd-and-blu-ray-support-in-32-bit-vista-questioned.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Microsoft Senior Program Manager Steve Riley announced that HD DVD and Blu-ray will only play in 64-bit version of forthcoming Windows Vista, because Microsoft intentionally crippled HD DVD and Blu-ray support in Vista 32-bit, Microsoft PR manager Adam Anderson said to CNet that the original statement made by Riley is partially incorrect.
&#8220;Any next-generation high [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Microsoft Senior Program Manager Steve Riley announced that HD DVD and Blu-ray will only play in 64-bit version of forthcoming Windows Vista, because <strong>Microsoft intentionally crippled HD DVD and Blu-ray support in Vista 32-bit</strong>, Microsoft PR manager Adam Anderson said to CNet that the original statement made by Riley is partially incorrect.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any next-generation high definition content will not play in x32 at all. This is a decision that the Media Player folks made because there are just too many ways right now for unsigned kernel mode code [to compromise content protection]. The media companies asked us to do this and said they don&#8217;t want any of their high definition content to play in x32 at all, because of all of the unsigned malware that runs in kernel mode can get around content protection, so we had to do this,&#8221; Riley said during the TechEd 2006 in Sydney.</p>
<p>But, Anderson says &#8220;it is up to the ISVs providing playback solutions to determine whether the intended playback environment, including environments with a 32-bit CPU, meets the performance requirements to allow high-definition playback while supporting the guidelines set forth by the content owners&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;No version of Windows Vista will make a determination as to whether any given piece of content should play back or not&#8221;, Microsoft PR manager tells CNet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/hd-dvd-and-blu-ray-support-in-32-bit-vista-questioned.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leopard vs 64-bit Vista: Mac OS X Better in Terms of 32-Bit Support</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/leopard-vs-64-bit-vista-os-x-better-in-terms-of-32-bit-support.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/leopard-vs-64-bit-vista-os-x-better-in-terms-of-32-bit-support.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Leopard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/leopard-vs-64-bit-vista-os-x-better-in-terms-of-32-bit-support.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the 64-bit Windows Vista installation will come with a 32-bit emulation layer called Window on Windows (WOW) which will allow you to run your old 32-bit apps on your 64-bit Vista via emulation, the 32-bit hardware drivers will not work on new Microsoft&#8217;s operating system. Opposite to that, recently previewed Mac OS X Leopard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the 64-bit Windows Vista installation will come with a 32-bit emulation layer called Window on Windows (WOW) which will allow you to run your old 32-bit apps on your 64-bit Vista via emulation, the 32-bit hardware drivers will not work on new Microsoft&#8217;s operating system. Opposite to that, recently previewed Mac OS X Leopard will come with 64-bit and full non-emulated 32-bit support.</p>
<p>Dean Pullen in his article for The Inquirer sees Leopard&#8217;s non-emulated support for 32-bit applications and drivers as a great advantage compared to 64-bit version of Windows Vista.</p>
<p>&#8220;Note that the non-emulated support in OSX is for applications and drivers. 32-bit programs on Vista 64 need to work on WOW emulation to run in Vista, and 32-bit drivers are a no-no. Lack of driver support is the main reason Windows XP x64 hasn&#8217;t been widely adopted, and why the Vista fudge will ensure hardware incompatibilities between the two Windows versions remain for sometime to come.</p>
<p>This is quite a boon for OSX, and one that should be highlighted frequently and often,&#8221; says Pullen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33666" target="new">64-bit Leopard knocks spots off Vista</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/leopard-vs-64-bit-vista-os-x-better-in-terms-of-32-bit-support.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ActiveWin: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Processor Review</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/activewin-amd-athlon-64-x2-5000-processor-review.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/activewin-amd-athlon-64-x2-5000-processor-review.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/activewin-amd-athlon-64-x2-5000-processor-review.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ActiveWin reviewed AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processor. They also installed Windows Vista 64-bit edition on PC featuring Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Here are some quotes from this review with links to its pages.
AMD has been the king of 64-bit computing for some time now and no matter what Intel has attempted to throw in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ActiveWin reviewed <strong>AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+</strong> processor. They also installed <strong>Windows Vista 64-bit</strong> edition on PC featuring Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Here are some quotes from this review with links to its pages.</p>
<p>AMD has been the king of 64-bit computing for some time now and no matter what Intel has attempted to throw in front of them, AMD have hurdled over it. With the release of the new AMD AM2 Motherboards and processors AMD are now not only pushing the envelope on the 64-bit and Dual Core front, they are reducing the amount of energy and power that the processors take up, thus producing quieter and cooler PC&#8217;s. The big question is, has the wait for the new AM2 processors and motherboards been worth it? Do we see any benefit from using DDR2 memory compared to the old DDR2 on the previous Socket 939 processors, read on and we&#8217;ll find out. This review will also concentrate on the future impact the processor will have when used with Windows Vista, we&#8217;ll be putting it through its paces on the newly released beta 2 version of the upcoming Microsoft operating system.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.activewin.com/reviews/hardware/processors/amd/5000+x2/index.shtml" target="new">ActiveWin: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Processor- Review</a></p>
<p>One major enhancement in Windows Vista 64-bit edition is that they provide much improved security features over the plain 32-bit versions. thanks to the No Execute (NX) technology and Data Execution Protection (DEP) which help to try and prevent buffer overflows that are the most common used attacks around today.  So all in all everything looks very promising for Windows Vista performance on the latest AMD based processors, personally I can&#8217;t wait for the new operating system to come out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.activewin.com/reviews/hardware/processors/amd/5000+x2/windows_vista.shtml" target="new">ActiveWin: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Processor- Review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/activewin-amd-athlon-64-x2-5000-processor-review.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Beta 2 64-bit Performance Review</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-64-bit-performance-review.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-64-bit-performance-review.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-64-bit-performance-review.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your computer is a workstation, then Cinebench is a great reference benchmark. The faster your CPU can render the image, the higher the score. The 64-Bit version of the program was used under the 64-Bit OS&#8217;, and made a very noticeable difference. Between Vista and x64 though, the performance difference is rather minute.
Super Pi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your computer is a workstation, then Cinebench is a great reference benchmark. The faster your CPU can render the image, the higher the score. The 64-Bit version of the program was used under the 64-Bit OS&#8217;, and made a very noticeable difference. Between Vista and x64 though, the performance difference is rather minute.</p>
<p>Super Pi calculates a specified about of digits past the decimal place. In our case, I ran the 8 Million test, which turned out to be in x64&#8217;s favor. Overall, x64 shaved 12 seconds off what the 64-Bit version of Vista could do. For minor multi-media benchmarking, I used Nero Recode to recompress a DVD video. I first extracted the video, in this case &#8220;Bad Religion - Live At The Palladium&#8221;, and used Recode to compress it so that it could be burned to a standard 4.5GB DVD.</p>
<p>The results are odd here. There was a huge hike in 64-Bit Vista with 2GB, but that didn&#8217;t happen with 4GB installed. In the end, x64 proved to compress the video more than 2 minutes faster than Vista.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techgage.com/review.php?id=5175&#038;page=3" target="new">Techgage - Review: Windows Vista Beta 2 Performance Reports</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-64-bit-performance-review.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista x64 (64-bit) Review</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-x64-64-bit-review.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-x64-64-bit-review.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-x64-64-bit-review.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a part of Windows Vista x64 review with link to full story. Vista was installed on 64-bit laptop and 64-bit desktop PC. 
I have been running Windows Vista for the last couple of months now on my main work laptop (64-bit AMD Turion, 2Gb ram, ATI Radeon Xpress 200M graphics), which I am [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a part of Windows Vista x64 review with link to full story. Vista was installed on 64-bit laptop and 64-bit desktop PC. </p>
<blockquote><p>I have been running Windows Vista for the last couple of months now on my main work laptop (64-bit AMD Turion, 2Gb ram, ATI Radeon Xpress 200M graphics), which I am typing this up on now, and it’s been running on my Dual Opteron workstation (Dual 2Gz Opteron, 2Gb ram, NVidia 6600 Graphics) at home since I got it and 3 months ago. Since then I have had some minor issues with different builds, but the system works without flaw 99% of the time, if not more. There are some driver issues (namely lack of a sound driver and card reader for my laptop, and I think the issues with the noise from the Opterons may be caused by an older system driver), but this is to be expected for beta software. I haven’t had my system Crash fully in a while now with it running. I have had one or 2 graphics driver crashes, but this did not cause an issue because the graphics driver was unloaded and reloaded and the system stayed up, and everything where I left it.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>There is not a lot about x64 (64-bit) I can tell you that you probably don’t already know, but the thing that interests me most about it is the fact that Vista is fully supportive of x64 (64-bit). With Windows XP, x64 did not ship at RTM time, and it was a different kernel to XP. XP was version 5.0 of the kernel, but X64 XP was 5.1, the same kernel as windows 2003 server. This is not a bad thing, as Servers are generally more stable then client machines, but it caused some issues. Also drivers where a problem. Now I know I just said I had driver issues, but if all goes to plan, these will go away. At the moment there are a lot of machines selling with x64 (or EMT64) processors, but a lot of these ship with Windows XP 32 bit edition. I hope that the release of vista will solve this problem and give us some proper support for X64 as a platform.
</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.lotas-smartman.net/archive/2006/06/08/12552.aspx" target="new">Tiernans Comms Closet : Windows Vista Review: Part 1: Stability, performance, x64</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-x64-64-bit-review.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Beta 2 Download Available</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-download-available.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-download-available.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 08:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-download-available.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Vista Beta 2 download is now available. The download is an ISO file of Windows Vista Beta 2, which is about 3.5 gigabytes (GB) for the 32-bit edition or 4.4 GB for the 64-bit edition.
There is also option to have the Windows Vista Beta 2 and RC1 DVD kits sent to your home or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/wp-content/_logo_vista.gif" width="120" height="120" alt="Windows Vista Beta 2 Download" title="Windows Vista Beta 2 Download" /><strong>Windows Vista Beta 2 download</strong> is now available. The download is an ISO file of Windows Vista Beta 2, which is about 3.5 gigabytes (GB) for the 32-bit edition or 4.4 GB for the 64-bit edition.</p>
<p>There is also option to have the Windows Vista Beta 2 and RC1 DVD kits sent to your home or office. This option requires payment to cover DVD production, shipping, and handling costs.<br />
<span id="more-28"></span><br />
You can download Vista Beta 2 here: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/preview.mspx" target="new">Windows Vista: Customer Preview Program</a>.</p>
<div class="chitika"><eminimall products="windows vista"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-beta-2-download-available.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Hardware: What to Buy Today for Tomorrow&#8217;s OS</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-hardware-what-to-buy-today-for-tomorrows-os.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-hardware-what-to-buy-today-for-tomorrows-os.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Hardware News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Desktops &#038; Media Centers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-hardware-what-to-buy-today-for-tomorrows-os.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buying systems with 2GB of RAM and a 128MB-256MB video card isn&#8217;t a big deal. The question mark happens when you consider CPUs. Purchasing a a 32-bit CPU vs. a 64-bit CPU is the issue. 32-bit silicon is enough to run Vista, but we definitely like the 64-bit performance. Only trouble is, if you buy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying systems with 2GB of RAM and a 128MB-256MB video card isn&#8217;t a big deal. The question mark happens when you consider CPUs. Purchasing a a <strong>32-bit CPU</strong> vs. a <strong>64-bit CPU</strong> is the issue. 32-bit silicon is enough to run Vista, but we definitely like the 64-bit performance. Only trouble is, if you buy a 64-bit CPU today, you&#8217;re either wasting it on Windows XP 32-bit, or you&#8217;re dealing with loads of driver issues if you opt for Windows XP x64.</p>
<p>My advice is to buy the 64-bit CPU now, run it in 32-bit mode and then move up to a 64-bit OS with the swap to Vista. </p>
<p><a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/smbit/archives/2006/06/vista_hardware.html" target="new">SMB IT | InfoWorld | Vista Hardware: What to Buy Today for Tomorrow&#8217;s OS | June 5, 2006 05:16 PM | By Oliver Rist</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/vista-hardware-what-to-buy-today-for-tomorrows-os.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD chips signal new era in Windows shops</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/amd-chips-signal-new-era-in-windows-shops.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/amd-chips-signal-new-era-in-windows-shops.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Hardware News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/amd-chips-signal-new-era-in-windows-shops.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was once uncommon to see servers running Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Opteron processors in IT shops that heavily favored the Windows operating system. But Windows managers no longer rely exclusively on machines with processors made by Intel Corp. Joan Goodchild met with Barry Crume, AMD&#8217;s Microsoft Alliance director, at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/wp-content/_amd.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="AMD" title="AMD" />It was once uncommon to see servers running Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Opteron processors in IT shops that heavily favored the Windows operating system. But Windows managers no longer rely exclusively on machines with processors made by Intel Corp. Joan Goodchild met with Barry Crume, AMD&#8217;s Microsoft Alliance director, at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference, for his perspective on new trends in Windows hardware, Vista and virtualization.</p>
<p>SearchWinIT.com: Your job, as you describe it, is to make sure AMD and Microsoft products work together. What have you been collaborating on recently</p>
<p>Barry Crume: We are helping Microsoft make all their products with a clear bias toward 64-bit and dual core processors. Recently a lot of the emphasis has been on Vista and it has been exciting to have the challenge of solving some of the complexities of developing an operating system. Developing complex code takes engineers a lot of time and [a lot of testing]. Million-line code problems are tough to solve. It may have complexity on the back side, which means you need a lot of computing horsepower. But at end of day, if it is easy to understand, then we have solved the problem.</p>
<p><a href="http://searchwinit.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid1_gci1191407,00.html" target="new">AMD chips signal new era in Windows shops</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/amd-chips-signal-new-era-in-windows-shops.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft moving to 64-bit only, says Gates</title>
		<link>http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-moving-to-64-bit-only-says-gates.html</link>
		<comments>http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-moving-to-64-bit-only-says-gates.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 02:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[64-Bit Software News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista 64-bit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64-bit-computers.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft will be shifting its products to 64-bit only beginning later this year, Bill Gates told more than 3,500 attendees at the company’s Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) in Seattle on Tuesday.
The Microsoft chairman and chief software architect also used his keynote at WinHEC to announce the availability of beta 2 releases of three major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft will be shifting its products to 64-bit only beginning later this year, Bill Gates told more than 3,500 attendees at the company’s Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) in Seattle on Tuesday.</p>
<p>The Microsoft chairman and chief software architect also used his keynote at WinHEC to announce the availability of beta 2 releases of three major products: Microsoft’s latest and long-awaited operating system (OS) Windows Vista, its next office suite, Microsoft Office 2007, and Windows Server, codenamed Longhorn.</p>
<p>While the beta 2 of Windows Vista is available, the consumer version of the new OS could be pushed back past the stated January launch date, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said at a news conference in Tokyo.</p>
<p>The operating system was due to be launched this year but in March the company said it wouldn&#8217;t get broad release until January 2007. Ballmer said the planned January launch may slip further based on feedback from a beta release program and the product road-maps of hardware vendors. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.itworldcanada.com/a/News/5be308e6-205d-4528-b05d-315dc5887bca.html" target="new">Enterprise Infrastructure > Servers and Mainframes > WinHEC: Microsoft moving to 64 bit only, says Gates</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://64-bit-computers.com/microsoft-moving-to-64-bit-only-says-gates.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
